• 0 Posts
  • 185 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • The real question is all the stuff beyond just having the distro installed. The packages, the services, the configs, the application data.

    If you leave all that stuff the way it was installed via the old package manager, it may have some bad assumptions baked in and may be incompatible with packages you install with the new package manager.

    And if you clear all of it out and reinstall it, have you really gained anything vs. just doing a clean install?

    There’s a reason you have a home dir. Just copy that forward along with whatever other config files you might’ve customized.

    Btw, if the ability to make drastic changes while still maintaining continuity is an important feature for you, maybe check out NixOS.




  • kibiz0r@midwest.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlIt's Women's Fault
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    toxic men

    Kinda sad and ironic, that the term “toxic masculinity” began as a way to describe how culture manufactures a harmful concept of what it means to be a man, and it seeps into men and damages them like a toxin… but now we use it to mean that the man himself is toxic, undermining the whole notion of thinking of the problem as systemic rather than one of individuals.

    Anyway, patriarchy is absolutely demolishing men right now, and the political right is saying “women’s fault” while the left is saying “lmao skill issue”. If we don’t get our shit together and start treating this seriously, we’re gonna have big problems.













  • If an LLM consumes the same copyrighted content and learns how to copy its various characteristics, how is it meaningfully different from me doing it and becoming a successful writer?

    That is the trillion-dollar question, isn’t it?

    I’ve got two thoughts to frame the question, but I won’t give an answer.

    1. Laws are just social constructs, to help people get along with each other. They’re not supposed to be grand universal moral frameworks, or coherent/consistent philosophies. They’re always full of contradictions. So… does it even matter if it’s “meaningfully” different or not, if it’s socially useful to treat it as different (or not)?
    2. We’ve seen with digital locks, gig work, algorithmic market manipulation, and playing either side of Section 230 when convenient… that the ethos of big tech is pretty much “define what’s illegal, so I can colonize the precise border of illegality, to a fractal level of granularity”. I’m not super stoked to come with an objective quantitative framework for them to follow, cuz I know they’ll just flow around it like water and continue to find ways to do antisocial shit in ways that technically follow the rules.