• 8 Posts
  • 451 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 30th, 2023
  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•Why so many white Americans claim to be native?
    6·
    4 months ago

    As a resident of the Pacific Northwest, there are so many Native names on everything, but the tribes themselves are unknown.

    Example - Multnomah County:

    The Multnomah were a division of the Chinook people, but I’d wager most folks aren’t even aware that Multnomah were a people.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multnomah_people

    “In 1830, a disease generally thought to have been malaria devastated the Multnomah villages.[2] Within five years, the village of Cathlapotle was abandoned and was briefly inhabited by the Cowlitz tribe. The Multnomah people had nearly been wiped out by the year 1834 due to malaria and smallpox outbreaks. With only a few Multnomah left by the year 1910, the remaining people were transferred to the Grand Ronde Community which is also located in the Northwest of Oregon.[3]”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldtoBooks@lemmy.ml•Question: What are the worst books on Project Gutenberg (or other terrible public domain writing)?
    3·
    5 months ago

    I’ve read a lot of books, personally, professionally, and in education.

    The worst public domain book I can recall is “The Art of War in the Middle Ages”. It is the epitome of “Some works should not be set aside lightly, they should be thrown with great force!”

    https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44308#%3A~%3Atext=The+Art+of+War+in%2Cto+evolving+threats+and+challenges.+(

    A sample:

    "The Teutonic nation of North-Western Europe did not​–​like the Goths and Lombards​–​owe their victories to the strength of their mail-clad cavalry. The Franks and Saxons of the sixth and seventh centuries were still infantry. It would appear that the moors of North Germany and Schleswig, and the heaths and marshes of Belgium, were less favourable to the growth of cavalry than the steppes of the Ukraine or the plains of the Danube valley. The Frank, as pictured to us by Sidonius Apollinaris, Procopius, and Agathias, still bore a considerable resemblance to his Sigambrian ancestors. Like them he was destitute of helmet and body-armour; his shield, however, had become a much more effective defence than the wicker framework of the first century: it was a solid oval with a large iron boss and rim. The ‘framea’ had now been superseded by the ‘angon’​–​‘a dart neither very long nor very short, which can be used against the enemy either by grasping it as a pike or hurling it16.’ The iron of its head extended far down the shaft; at its ‘neck’ were two barbs, which made its extraction from a wound or a pierced shield almost impossible. The ‘francisca,’ however, was the great weapon of the people from whom it derived its name. It was a single-bladed battle-axe17, with a heavy head composed of a long blade curved on its outer face and deeply hollowed in the interior. It was carefully weighted, so that it could be used, like an American tomahawk, for hurling at the enemy. The skill with which the Franks discharged this weapon, just before closing with the hostile line, was extraordinary, and its effectiveness made it their favourite arm. A sword and dagger (‘scramasax’) completed the normal equipment of the warrior; the last was a broad thrusting blade, 18 inches long, the former a two-edged cutting weapon of about 2½ feet in length.

    Such was the equipment of the armies which Theodebert, Buccelin, and Lothair led down into Italy in the middle of the sixth century. Procopius informs us that the first-named prince brought with him some cavalry; their numbers, however, were insignificant, a few hundreds in an army of 90,000 men. They carried the lance and a small round buckler, and served as a body-guard round the person of the king. Their presence, though pointing to a new military departure among the Franks, only serves to show the continued predominance of infantry in their armies."