They dished out a huge flop - there’s no way this will pay the production cost

If from poster alone you can tell they failed to capture characters, you know it’s bad

It will be $7.99 - look it’s so much less than $175, so much cheaper!

/s

I have updated the title. I do believe however that in the context of exponential growth of renewable energy this isn’t a massive difference

It would be the 8th largest country in the world.

That doesn’t seem correct. If you assume 250kwh per square meter per year, it sums to something linke 500000km2 or 700x700km square. And in the hottest regions it’s more like 500kwh per m2 per year

path for exploitation

Why is that?

It’s a stretch but not a massive one - I think 2035 is more realistic. Solar deployments double around every 3 years so it’ll double by 2027 and quadruple by 2030 and so on unless some limiting factor is reached

If the data is correct, these are the last years of fossil growth - from now on, renewables will be outpeacing the growing demand

We aren’t. These two chemistries are going to coexist side by side