Pennomi

But if we all talk like that, and AI learns to talk like that from humans, then the AI has succeeded in emulating human speech again. 🤔

Check out Ollama, it’s probably the easiest way to get started these days. It provides tooling and an api that different chat frontends can connect to.

Locally run AI: 0

There’s a shit ton of modern AIs that are actively talked about and aren’t LLMs. What about AlphaFold? Or StableDiffusion, or the reinforcement learning running Boston Dynamic’s robots, or like, every computer vision classification task ever, or the software behind Waymo, or GANs like they use in Snapchat filters? Heck, people still consider Deep Blue an AI even though it’s completely obsolete today.

People still call this stuff AI (because it is) even though most of them have nothing to do with LLMs.

Nah the guy on the right understands that AI means almost anything. Hell, even the A* pathfinding algorithm falls under the realm of AI.

They really are! We should use tools for what they are good at and not try to cram AI into everything. Something something hammer, nail, right?

I just got done reading a post about 40k (Warhammer) and got sad that you had to pull your entire army off the field.

I mean I guess pulling your 401k is a sign of impending doom too.

The difference is that aged people tend to forget their training more. I’m not worried about the youngins.

How will they enforce this? And won’t the actual effect be the improvement of LLMs to the point they can no longer be distinguished from human text? I suspect this will end up being like a slow GAN training the LLMs.

Yep, unlike the US, they aren’t shooting themself in the foot. As they industrialize and invest in Africa, they are displacing the established world order.

Or in other words, “free will” is a macroscopic effect arising from the fundamental laws of the universe. Like most everything else we deal with.

Like… temperature doesn’t really exist, it’s really just an average of kinetic energy of particles. But that doesn’t stop it from being a useful concept!

What’s there to debate? You put your data in a public site, it gets read by anybody who wants it. Period.

Right. The problem is not the fact it consumes the information, the problem is if the user uses it to violate copyright. It’s just a tool after all.

Like, I’m capable of violating copyright in infinitely many ways, but I usually don’t.

It’s only theft if they support laws preventing their competitors from doing it too. Which is kind of what OpenAI did, and now they’re walking that idea back because they’re losing again.

The reasons keep on stacking up.

Eh, spend that money on indie games and you’re doing good in the world regardless.

Source: Trust me bro, my wife’s friend’s cousin was a tree.

Even more impressive, I heard that TREES are made out of wood!

Right, the offline version (if you have the hardware to run it) is completely under your control, and no one can take that away from you. Honestly nice to see that happen, I thought it would take several years.

To be fair, I trust ChatGPT to not make typos a hell of a lot more than Trump’s people. AI might be wrong at a high level but it usually gets the little details like typos right.