In the spirit of dumbing down the plot to make sure viewers don’t turn away, they end up making totally nonsensical (if not misleading) content.

They can be. Because of course there are poorly made commercial units that are only quiet because they have low CADR. But you’ll never be able to get a DIY box as quiet as a well made unit, unless you basically engineer your own air purifier device, use blower motors, etc., but that’s not a Corsi-Rosenthal Box.

It’s not just about aesthetics. That DIY box will be loud as hell.

So basically an OS. The only difference is that the OS developer doesn’t control or make all the apps (features). Which I think is good for competition, but bad for tight integration.

But this is exactly what we like to avoid from Google and Apple. Perhaps, it can work in China because of strong Govt oversight (read: control), but not in U.S…

OP is from the future, when GPUs are a subscription service that processes your graphics online.

TL;DR over from Puget reddit accounts is that their overall failure rates for all chips is very low because they run it at tightly controlled base specs.

So any automatic boosting/OC doesn’t come in play here, which might be why Intel chips are failing more in the broader user space.

Why does “nothing but” and “all but” mean the same thing?

Veritasium. Over time I realized his content is mostly about flashy half baked “sciencey” content like Discovery Channel. It’s meant to get an audience and nothing more. It lacks quality control, and fact checking. I only realized how many errors his videos have when he covered a topic I know more about. Also, the whole electricity thing and self driving car debacle only reinforced my views on his content.

I like it inside, where you loop it through the tube.

In 2024 life is hard and you can’t do anything about it in most cases. Religion gives you an excuse for why it must be so, so that you can keep grinding away.

The video fails to explain what about this is “AI” as opposed to active noise cancelling with some regular old signal processing.

The article didn’t bother to link the paper. Also odd way to put it to say it “increases signature”. Like, have they found a way to throw radar reflecting goo on the F-22?

No, this is essentially about networked radars. Which would be interesting if they bothered to discuss the tech. I suppose I’ll wait for Sandboxx News to cover it.

You’re thinking with capitalism of the yesteryear.

Calculator about HDMI and displayport bandwidth that might help: https://linustechtips.com/topic/729232-guide-to-display-cables-adapters-v2/?section=calc&mode=maxfreq&H=3840&V=2160&F=120&bpc=10&compression=dsc2.5x&calculations=show

As you go up in complexity like 4k and 4:4:4 HDR, you will have to pay more attention to HDMI bandwidth and cable length limits.

Look for “certified” premium or high speed cables.

This is getting out of hand. What’s next? We’re gonna name and shame individual cows?

Can’t say I dislike it