The first gamer pope 😎
- 1 Post
- 50 Comments
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@lemmy.ml•They Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.9·1 month agoSure. For the fact that many jurisdictions outside of the US also consider freedom of speech and other human rights to apply between private parties: this is called “horizontal effect” and covered extensively in case law by e.g. the European Court of Human Rights. See also this chapter for an international comparison and this paper for a European perspective.
As for the specific rules in the EU for platforms: Article 17 of the Digital Services Act requires that users who are banned or shadowbanned from any platform are provided with specific information of what rule they broke, which they can then appeal internally or in court. Article 34 and 35 requires very large platforms (such as X) to take broad measures to protect i.a. the users’ freedom of speech.
More to the point, one person who was shadowbanned by X in a similar way used the DSA and won in court
(Edited to add the last paragraph)
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@lemmy.ml•They Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.94·1 month ago*in the US.
The EU recognizes that human right such as freedom of speech also should be protected against private parties. Platforms can’t ban or restrict you for arbitrary reasons here.
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@lemmy.ml•They Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.6·1 month agoI’m of the opinion that having a lot of money shouldn’t, in fact, allow you to do what you want. No person should have this power to do mass censorship, not in the last place because manipulating online discourse means manipulating a fundamental aspect of democracy.
Musk specifically is meddling in elections, both in the EU and the US by e.g. bribing voters. Turning the dials of the algorithm lets him do this even more effectively.
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@beehaw.org•Facebook flags Linux topics as 'cybersecurity threats' — posts and users being blocked78·4 months agoTurns out when Zuckerbot was talking about “allowing more speech on the platform”, he just meant more slurs.
How does that increase the risk compared to something like JBOD or overlayfs? In both cases you will lose data if a drive fails. Keep in mind that this is btrfs raid0, not regular raid. If anything that decreases the chance of corruption because the metadata is redundantly stored on both drives.
koper@feddit.nlto Linux@lemmy.ml•So, you've found the light. You are now a penguin herder...18·4 months agoNo mention of systemd? This is unacceptable.
A disk failure will cause you to lose data, yes. But that’s also the case in all the other solutions discussed here. Backups should be handled separately and are not part of the original question.
Have you considered simply setting btrfs to RAID 0?
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@beehaw.org•App stores unconvinced by Trump's pause of TikTok ban, which may be on shaky legal ground20·4 months ago“May be on shaky legal ground”
The law clearly states that Tiktok is banned and should be made inaccessible. The president cannot unilaterally change the law. They even got a lawyer to explain this to them.
Regardless of what you think of the ban, there can be no doubt about the fact that this is what the law says. No matter what Trump claims. If journalists show this level of misregard for truth and the rule of law, things are going to become much worse.
koper@feddit.nlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Flirting with Trump is flirting with Nazism - Response to Andy Yen (CEO of Proton AG) on Reddit 📢📢📢522·4 months agoThe fight for privacy and digital freedom is inherently political.
Even if you computer is not exposed to the internet: are you certain that every other device on the network is safe (even on public wifi)? Would you immediately raise the alarm if you saw a second printer in the list with the same name, or something like “Print to file”? I think I personally could fall for that under the right circumstances.
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@beehaw.org•A more complete explanation for the removal of those Russian Linux kernel maintainers4·7 months agoPutin couldn’t care less about the support from some random programmers. Be realistic, what do you expect them to do? Take up arms? Protest and get imprisoned? Vote in the sham elections?
Targeting random civilians in hopes of political change is the strategy of terrorists.
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@beehaw.org•A more complete explanation for the removal of those Russian Linux kernel maintainers4·7 months agoSo then you agree that there is no reason to be “glad” about this?
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@beehaw.org•A more complete explanation for the removal of those Russian Linux kernel maintainers7·7 months agoAnd how exactly is banning these contributors supposed to stop the invasion? These people have no control or culpability.
koper@feddit.nlto Linux@lemmy.ml•GIMP - Development Update: Closing In on the 3.0 Release Candidate15·8 months agoIs this a threat?
This doesn’t advocate for any substantial improvement of data protections. It’s merely a convenience argument to legitimize banning Chinese cars for economic reasons. American car manufacturers will continue to harvest and sell all your data, just with less competition.
Of course, this isn’t a surprise coming from the CFR, the lobbying organization for US imperialism.
koper@feddit.nlto Technology@beehaw.org•The burning of the Library of Alexandria for fandoms16·9 months agoSuch is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.
Websites do not have access to your IMEI. That’s only a concern when you use the app.