

ok, yes, i suppose i should not have mentioned the scripts without attaching a warning.
i’m still grateful though that someone put in the effort to write 'em, because they finally solved a problem for me that i couldn’t solve for years.
i guess now it’s “the communities” turn to properly document and dissect those scripts for the larger user base.
i’m certainly not angry with whoever wrote those scripts because he didn’t put in even more effort for free.
but i do get your point (i think) and agree.
hmm, usually the & is not part of the filename and just tells the script to run in the background 🤔
but i’m not sure what it means in this case.