That’s a very reasonable response, and I’m not sure how to put into words the reasons I disagree.
I think i would say that while privacy is important and should be valued, I believe that protecting against the harm that individuals can do with tools such as this one is a greater good for society than the harm caused by ensuring that tools such as these are not allowed.
So now you’re moving to avoid jurisdiction rather than just not enabling csam?
How do you mean verify the file?
That really surprises me. Id have thought it would be way more closed than that.
I don’t think it is. Sorry, I completely missed where you said FOSS.
The number 14, seriously, it’s everywhere
Huh, TIL, thanks
Or a vase of petunias and a blue whale skeleton?
and they’ve got a pretty good justification for it too
Sounds ace, thanks
Could you explain more about transit?
That makes a lot of sense actually _ if not seen the justification posted anywhere. thanks
This, I don’t live then e.g. throwing paint on painting because it seems kind of pointless, but at least it gets attention.
I’m about halfway through the queen of the tearling
Sad times. Stumble upon was great!
Well, I can live without yoghurt
The toblerone one is incredible!
Tony’s Chocolate …
But how would you do this if you can’t see in the files?
Edit: Ah, I see, if they gave you the password.
Edit 2: You might want to look at local laws. In many places, ‘checking’ to see if there is CSAM is still considered viewing CSAM.