But that’s not what you wrote. You claimed that it doesn’t show new information because you can see the favicon and title. It does show new information.
- 1 Post
- 53 Comments
When I shop online, I have many tabs from the same site open. The tab title is the store name + the item name, so the item name never fits. A bunch of identical ebay icons is way worse than this.
It’s not objectively better or worse. Some people will prefer it and some people won’t.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Does anyone understand the point of advertising a game doing something that, after downloading, it does not do?21·1 year agoThis was my thought as well. A lot of these games are never made, even when the ads do very well (as evidenced by the ad continuing for years). Someone actually made the bait game for real, in recognition of the fact that the games have been advertised for many years and never made.
Even if OP’s explanation is sometimes correct, it doesn’t seem typically correct. In fact, it seems like a rare edge case, at best.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Memes@lemmy.ml•When you are privileged equality looks like a downgrade.10·1 year agoThis is also how I read it. I actually really appreciate attacking the idea of “white as default”. It’s kind of like how some gamers think representing anything besides the “default” demographic is “political”.
I think this is the more revealing excerpt:
This is the defining irony of white film-making. The more oblivious your film is to matters of race, the whiter it plays. Because whiteness is often exactly that: the freedom not to see race, even when it’s right there in front of you.
Basically, being aware of whiteness makes for less racist movies. There’s nothing wrong with white movies, but it’s wrong when white movies pretend they’re not white, but universal and default. The article concludes:
Instead, our twofold expectation should be this: 1) The industry affords more film-makers of colour the same creative freedoms and commercial opportunities that are now afforded white film-makers, and 2) That the film culture – including the film-makers themselves – develop the confidence, insight and language to discuss and dethrone white cinema.
This does not sound like racist dog-whistling or white supremacy to me.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Do EV's actually do anything beneficial for the planet?1·1 year agoI agree, but just to clarify a minor point: small rural towns are actually some of the most walkable and bikable because they were built before cars. If you’re staying within a rural town, you don’t need a car.
Happening in Canada too. For the last decade, virtually every province has been led by Conservative governments (except BC and that was just half a decade ago). Healthcare and housing has been slowly falling apart.
Looking at the polls, what’s amazing is that most Canadian voters seem to think the problem is insufficient conservatism!
In context, I clearly meant “most apps people use and need”. Almost all the streaming apps, all the corporate social media apps, all the payment apps, etc seem to be problematic.
Remember that the larger discussion is about the viability of protecting your privacy on Android vs iPhone. Sure everything is “possible” if you futz with it enough, you could even code your own OS and all your own apps, but the more you have to futz, the less viable it is for most people.
No please read my comment again. I know there are alternative stores. In practice, many mainstream apps are not easy to install using these stores. If you had done a 1 minute search, you’d find tons of people complaining about trying to degoogle their phone. I think almost everyone just gives up on at least a few apps.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•People Who Don't Wear Deodorant or Seemingly Bathe Regularly, Why?143·1 year agoOne of the common definitions of “regularly” is “frequently”. E.g. “We used to meet regularly, but less and less as time went on.” This is also why frequent customers are called “regulars”.
edit: “Happening or doing something often” is even the first definition of the Cambridge English dictionary. Misinterpreting OP’s use of “regular” just feels like Stack Overflow level pedantry.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Technology@beehaw.org•Electric Vehicles Have 79% More Reliability Challenges Than Gas Powered Cars17·1 year agoWhy is Consumer Reports considered a rag?
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Technology@beehaw.org•Evernote is about to seriously limit its plan for free users15·1 year agoYes, Obsidian is great. The app itself is proprietary but the files are portable plain text. I feel like that makes it pretty future proof. If it ever shuts down or enshittifies, there will be alternatives.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's one small thing you've done to make your life easier?101·2 years agoI actually can’t understand how most people live without a password manager.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Technology@beehaw.org•What can you tell me about Bluesky?2·2 years agoThank you for the response. Alas, the monetization question is key to enshittification. I’m left unassuaged.
Let’s take a concrete example. There are a bunch of neo-nazis inciting real violence on Blue Sky. People will die. Does anyone have the power to do anything about them? Or can the neo-nazis " mix and match services and switch quickly" to escape any consequences? It’s a dilemma either way. On one fork, BS has no control, which means bad actors run free. On the other fork, BS does have control, which suggests they’re not as enshittification resistant as it may seem.
I know and am happy with how Activity Pub (Lemmy/Mastodon) deals with both forks, as imperfect as the system is. What about Blue Sky?
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Technology@beehaw.org•What can you tell me about Bluesky?3·2 years agoIt’s more robust against enshittification than your average Mastodon server
I’m very skeptical of that. What makes Mastodon so robust against enshittification is that it’s hard for a single or small set of players to have so much control that they can act as gatekeeper to extract money from the user base.
Blue Sky is a for-profit corporation. How do they plan to make money? Who controls access to the network? These are genuine questions.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What is a product that you won’t accept a generic alternative for?3·2 years agoYes, French sea salt especially for desserts! Put that sucker on some decadent butter cookies.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What is a product that you won’t accept a generic alternative for?3·2 years agoBlack Diamond salt for me, which is what a lot of restaurants use. Worth the extra cost, especially given how potent a small bit of salt is.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Technology@beehaw.org•Apple exec defends 8GB $1,599 MacBook Pro, claims it's like 16GB on a PC3·2 years agoThat assessment sounds right. I think we just need to stay vigilant as consumers. We have defeasible reason to trust Apple right now. But we’ve seen, especially recently, what happens when we let corporations take advantage of that hard earned trust for short term gain.
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.cato Technology@beehaw.org•Apple exec defends 8GB $1,599 MacBook Pro, claims it's like 16GB on a PC4·2 years agoI think that decision makes sense.
What you said got me worried, so I looked into the claim that it is “tracking all your behavior for advertising purposes and whatever else Apple decides”. That’s a convincing concern, and you’ve changed my mind on this. I don’t see any evidence that they’re doing anything close to this level of tracking — the main thing they seem to track is your Mac App Store usage — but they may have the potential to do so in the enshittified future. That gives me pause.
If anyone wants an actual answer: iPhone has an option to “Save to Files” that lets you select a folder to save to just like on a desktop OS. I’ve personally never lost a file when I do this.