He/him/they

Just a little guy interested in videogames, reading, technology and the environment.

I’m on Telegram - feel free to ask for my details :3

My other account is @OmegaMouse@feddit.uk

  • 1 Post
  • 36 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2024

help-circle
  • I thought both games were excellent, but yes there was definitely something about BOTW that set it apart. In addition to what you’ve said, I think it’s partially that BOTW was such a unique experience the first time through - little things like the stamina meter for climbing, the cooking to help you craft items that warm you up etc. Discovering these features and setting off in whichever direction you fancied was a joy. TOTK didn’t have this same joy, as I already knew about these mechanics. And it felt like there was much more of a push to get the player to go in a specific direction, rather than leaving the exploration up to them.

    I reckon they probably did the best job they could’ve with a sequel, but it was never going to be possible to live up to BOTW.







  • OmegaMouse@pawb.socialtoBooks@lemmy.mlArchival in a Fascist regime
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It seems that the material destroyed at the Institute for Sexual Science is precisely the sort of stuff that the Trump regime wishes to supress. So any LGBT research and information.

    Basically anything that the Nazis banned. The list here still seems relevant. Transpose ‘German’ for ‘American’:

    spoiler

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings#The_burnings_start

    All of these types of literature, as described by the Nazis, were to be banned:

    • The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany (H. G. Wells, Romain Rolland);
    • The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism;
    • Pacifist literature;
    • Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writings supporting the Weimar Republic (Walther Rathenau, Heinrich Mann, Thomas Mann);
    • All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud (Emil Ludwig); Books that advocate “art” which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist (George Grosz, Otto Dix, Bauhaus, Felix Mendelssohn);
    • Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, completely destroy the principles of race and Volk (Magnus Hirschfeld);
    • The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of “Asphalt and Civilization” literati: (Oskar Maria Graf, Heinrich Mann, Stefan Zweig, Jakob Wassermann, Franz Blei);
    • Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field;
    • Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life’s goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life;
    • Patriotic kitsch in literature.
    • Pornography and explicit literature
    • All books degrading German purity.

    I guess books that have been banned in US school libraries over the last few years too.

    And finally, any political material that is antithetical to the far right.


  • Thanks for clarifying. Free access to academic information for all is a worthy goal.

    One would hope that organisations hosting digital libraries of academic journals would hold those in perpetuity. But often the subscriptions are exploitatively expensive, and I’m of the opinion that such information should be made available for free. In any case, having private libraries as a backup is certainly a good idea for a variety of reasons.

    The same goes for preserving the volumes of data that will inevitably be quietly binned and forgotten to save server space.


  • I’ve read through the article, but I’m somewhat uncertain as to what particular texts the author is hoping to preserve. Mainly academic journals? Or is it just referring to any texts available online (the article does make reference to artistic works that can’t be ‘reinvented’)?

    It probably doesn’t help that I’m unfamiliar with a lot of the projects mentioned here.





  • Speaking of classics I have just now finished The Idiot by Dostoevsky. I think I need some time to process it! It felt like a commentary on the changing society of the time, and how a perfectly innocent and loving person couldn’t survive said society. More than anything the book seemed like a vessel for Dostoevsky to share various ideas and philosophies.


  • I’m currently reading The Idiot by Dostoevsky. It’s a lot more readable than I was expecting, though keeping track of all the character’s names is tricky at times (especially when they have multiple nicknames and alternate between referring to their first and middle names, and surname). I’m about a third of the way through; it feels like I’m yet to get to the ‘meat’ of the story. So far it has involved a naïve Prince getting to know various people in Russia, and invariably getting muddled up in their affairs. I’m fascinated to see where things go though!