Yeah, I even think Cube² was better.

Yeah, so much more there, they set up a very good universe to explore a tiny sand grain of it.

Ohhh, they are trying to say that “AAA” (10s+ or 100+ million budget) gaming dev industry has finally dieded?

This saves the PC gaming industry, imho.

Hot is hot,
and sex sells.

That’s good, I don’t think we have much common legislation (delegated acts) for headlights.
(Oh, there is something, but it’s way too short)

And I’m really proud of EU legislation, it has procedures that get shit done and in a predictable manner.

Wow, that sounds … undrivable.
Especially if you say it’s a regular occurrence.

Like, you wouldn’t/are unable to see any pedestrians or cars in front of you. That is really not ok.

Stay safe somehow.

And also it’s not this-ish (the angle depending on each person)?

Oh, thx for the description, I’m starting to understand now.

There isn’t any inherent reason why we couldn’t use reflector tech with LEDs - there wouldn’t even be anything wrong of you would exchange an incandescent bulb with LED if it was certified correctly (by the manufacturer, which actually exist), by which I mean with the right power & with full round and equal light emissions (for the reflector to pick up correctly). The LED emissions needn’t be harsher (tho the cheaper ones def are, low cri led are more power efficient too, but project a diminished spectrum) tho I def understand you.

The projector style headlamps also come (came?) with incandescent (instead of xenon or led) bulbs which still had the issue you point out at your 2). It’s not a bulb thing, it’s a light casting thing.
And projectors (incandescent, xenon, or led) are indeed used exactly bcs of what bothers you - they bleed less light around their target angles so they are legally allowed to be brighter (since at level they can emit more light without it crossing the threshold of for much of it bleeds higher than allowed). Yes, this doesn’t account for actual daily life, just a sterile average (which positively def affects safety too - ofc besides the issue is blinded drives you pointed out). But road infrastructure is a giant factor here. Cars shouldn’t jump up and down due to road quality.

To points 2) & 3) I would add that it makes an enormous difference if you suffer from the slightest astigmatism - for me that was what caused the diminished vision when someone slightly blinded me (the pain is considerably less to in road situations).

It’s what makes “single bright points” tolerable for short durations & it makes easier for the brains to compute around it (with astigmatism points become more like lines & brains now have to interpret/check those + lines are bigger than precise dots & it takes more info to process them). This isn’t noticeable during the day & it doesn’t necessarily mean your vision is below average.

Can I ask in what situations?

Like on even, level road when they are facing you?
Or like a hilly road?

And we arent talking high beams or fog lamps (some people just drive with them constantly)?

Or are the cars loaded at the back which makes their headlights point to high up?
And people don’t use this thing:
(This is what I mean by auto-leveling & that the govs should mandate it - people aren’t doing it manually & don’t know what this switch does … or don’t notice their headlamps are illuminating peoples faces in other cars.)

Wait, the new cars are not law compliant?

Seems country dependent. Maybe even mean purchasing-power related.

But it’s a people problem, they either use illegal (for their vehicle) bulbs or the infrastructure doesn’t demand better.

My 10 year old car has that. Just adaptive headlights.

USA legalised them only recently - that’s why (“expensive”) European cars in Murikan movies always had the shitty incandescent headlights that in most markets weren’t even available.

What deregulation-used brain that that doesn’t demand safe legal infrastructure for their roads made this meme?
(LEDs are the way safer tech, if they aren’t used wrong)

Brighter headlights than incandescent bulbs provided is a safety feature - legislation needs to make you safe by insuring irl that it’s not directed to other drivers (various countries also set max candles at various distances too, but that’s not even the issue).

A yearly mandatory roadworthiness test & legislation about what the max distance from road headlights can even be positioned solves all problems (apart from deliberate long-beaming peoples peepers - which should be solved by fees/cops).

Not to mention nowdays few cars don’t have auto-leveling or adaptive headlights. So it feels like a half-solved perform.
And again, like automatic emergency braking, govs could just demand auto-headlight-leveling as minimal equipment from some production date onwards.

Oh, I’m not disagreeing with it being weird, my main point was to switch the weirdness towards battery use as nothing else matters.

And CPU doesn’t bottleneck RAM usage.

As for use case (which again, I’m not disagreeing as my main point is “it wouldn’t affect you in any way other than battery” + “they prob went with the cheapest option that still works, just like they did with CPU”), prob apps being fully in RAM and not swap, not closing old apps, etc. So like FF & 3 chat/social media apps (they all have inefficiently big libraries), a few store and service apps (for car/taxi/food delivery/etc), none need to leave RAM. Idk how to get to 32, but perhaps over 16.

And again I point out that it’s just what they did for the project to survive, it’s clearly frankensteined from the cheapest sensible parts. In your analogy the i3 with 32 or 128GB of RAM, if sold at the same price, will preform the same for most users.

Bus already pointed out about actually having the chance to use the RAM.

In regards to cost - I would be confident they chose what was optimal, you can’t compare this to retail PC market, these are specific b2b deals, they could have literally gotten the 32GB chips significantly cheaper than 16GB.

What I’m not confident is battery usage, 32 giggies will use twice the power (which isn’t a lot but it is all the time, you don’t really turn off RAM) of the exact chip in 16 giggler flavour.

CPU bottlenecking isn’t really RAM related. And I wouldn’t say nowdays 5 year old CPUs are outdated (like a 5yo chip 10 or 15 years ago). I would use my phone much as my PC, so an old CPU but plenty of RAM sounds about what I want.
Also it’s Linux, not some bloated megacorp OS, so it’s a bit better, tho apps remain much the same (eg browsers & web pages).

The new eMMCs are 400MB/s (so SATA-ish level) with random writes about there as well, it depends what specifically they’ll be using. It’s also more power efficient than SSDs, however it can’t address more than 256GB (so consider SD speeds too).

There also isn’t anything wrong with having a lot of RAM if it doesn’t impact the battery considerably. Which it prob does.

Oh, I’m interested in diffident small gossip - I would like to observe chicken politics, and bee politics.

All the disputes, daily fads, coups, 1:1 bonding rituals, etc.

I need this but in a civilised polandball style.

Maybe ‘the same way windows is’ IBM-DOS

Soon to be closed-software Linux??? /s