Trailblazing Braille Taser

It doesn’t make as good of a meme, but I think a better analog would be a house that looks fine on the outside, but is completely absurd on closer inspection. Like, random plumbing, 90% of which is unused. Five bedrooms and zero bathrooms. A basement door with no stairs behind it.

I’m no AI proponent, but I’ll only believe that LLMs are causing this psychosis when I see a randomized controlled trial. Until then, it seems far more plausible that people experiencing delusions gravitate towards LLMs.

If Data had feelings, he’d be very upset right now.

One is his name, the other is not

Sorry, I was writing that in Trump’s voice. I am an American who loves and contributes to open-source :)

Freedom isn’t free as in beer?

If it’s free, then why are we paying for it?

Are you arguing that assembly languages are not architecture-specific? I don’t think that’s the typical definition.

Nasm is an assembler, but it also represents a specific assembly language targeting x86 architectures.

Gas is an assembler of a higher order. It can emit code for many architectures, and thus it accepts many different architecture-specific assembly languages.

You wouldn’t download… a vinyl record…

This stupid antique computer is the reason my iOS keyboard autocorrects “emacs” to “eMacs”

Is this a joke about bugs?

Relevant reading: https://justine.lol/lambda/

The jury is out on whether every finite sequence of digits is contained in pi.

However, there are a multitude of real numbers that contain every finite sequence of digits when written in base 10. Here’s one, which is defined by concatenating the digits of every non-negative integer in increasing order. It looks like this:

0 . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...

Wtf, why would you put the third cat at risk like that? You already had ample evidence that the name is cursed!

Take a look at all the struct definition. It’s a pure virtual method of 🍴 with a bunch of overrides in the structs that inherit from 🍴.

Dats a goose

Oh my god, enough already! Please give someone else a chance to reply! You’re taking up all the internet space.

The code is speaking to me, but it’s just word salad.

To be positively translucent, even someone with $1,000,000 in the bank has 1000x less than the poorest billionaire. For other disturbing facts, see https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/.

This all hinges on when you count the number of problems you have. But that’s why you have two eyes! Read the same page of books 1 and 2 in parallel and obliterate 100% of your problems.