warmaster@lemmy.world to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoMozilla Say Google Search Deal Vital to Firefox's Survivalwww.omgubuntu.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square84linkfedilinkarrow-up1229arrow-down14
arrow-up1225arrow-down1external-linkMozilla Say Google Search Deal Vital to Firefox's Survivalwww.omgubuntu.co.ukwarmaster@lemmy.world to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square84linkfedilink
minus-squaremelroy@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down11·1 year agoI think it’s actually a good thing. Let’s hope a new fork like Floorp or something will not just fork but take the lead and innovate! Firefox has not been innovating enough in the past 10 years. It’s slow and its not having any good features either.
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoThey’ve been innovating ways to get us to use their services, tho. Pocket, anyone?
minus-squareEphera@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoYeah, that is one of their attempts to get more independent from the Google money. They would need to be doing more of that, not less.
minus-squaremelroy@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoLet them first start on focusing on performance. Since that is now really bad in Firefox. The js engine sucks hard.
minus-squareMajesticElevator@lemmy.zipBannedlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIf you meant innovating ways to get your data, then yea
I think it’s actually a good thing. Let’s hope a new fork like Floorp or something will not just fork but take the lead and innovate!
Firefox has not been innovating enough in the past 10 years. It’s slow and its not having any good features either.
They’ve been innovating ways to get us to use their services, tho. Pocket, anyone?
Yeah, that is one of their attempts to get more independent from the Google money. They would need to be doing more of that, not less.
Let them first start on focusing on performance. Since that is now really bad in Firefox. The js engine sucks hard.
If you meant innovating ways to get your data, then yea