Lemmy Coupou.fr
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months ago

Chinese Sixth Generation Fighters Poised to Cut Pentagon Demand For F-35s: Lockheed Martin Stock Drops After New Jets’ Unveiling

militarywatchmagazine.com

external-link
message-square
107
link
fedilink
39
external-link

Chinese Sixth Generation Fighters Poised to Cut Pentagon Demand For F-35s: Lockheed Martin Stock Drops After New Jets’ Unveiling

militarywatchmagazine.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
107
link
fedilink
Stock of the United States’ largest defence contractor Lockheed Martin was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Deutsche Bank by 14.5 percent, with a price target of $523
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sure it’ll be just as successful at sucking up billions in taxes with nothing to show for it.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Producing literally hundreds of a single type of airplane with orders for the next decade or so isn’t exactly “nothing to show for”.

      And even if you discount the actual sales, getting billions in development budget from the US government is pretty good for business.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean yeah, the purpose of these companies is to put taxes back into the pockets of billionaires instead of spending them on stuff they’re meant for like infrastructure, healthcare, education, and so on. That’s why majority Americans live like dogs.

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Opposed to the Chinese corporations which are famously basically charity organizations?

          What exactly is your point? Your moving goalposts to completely different planets.

          • Mac@federation.red
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s yogthos lol, can’t expect anything less my friend

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Hey quick question genius, is Chinese military industry state owned or private? 🤡

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Looks like both.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s pretty much all state owned, and in cases where private industry is used, it’s tightly controlled including party members being embedded within the companies. In fact, the role of private industry in China has been declining overall https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/2024/chinas-private-sector-has-lost-ground-state-sector-has-gained-share-among

                  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Looks like AVIC is public and private, do you know the ownership breakdown?

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            China doesn’t use private sector for its military. Try to put a bit more work into your trolling.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              I disagree.

              https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_Aircraft_Industry_Group https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_Aircraft_Corporation

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                CAC has been promoted to a state enterprise in 1990. Try harder.

                • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Looks like it’s owned by Zhonghang Electronic Measuring Instruments, which is public? Or maybe they’re owned by AVIC which is both public and private?

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Private sector in China is not allowed to operate the same way the private sector operates in the west. So, your whole comparison is fundamentally flawed.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Have you seen their performance in Iran recently? They seem really good air to ground.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        You mean when Israel aborted the bulk of their attack because they got painted by radar?

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No, I mean the one that took down nearly the entirety of Irans air defenses with less than 100 weapons.

          https://www.iranintl.com/en/202412054965

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            send me a dm cause I have a bridge to sell you 😂

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              What’s your source that it was totally ineffective? Iran?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                There is zero evidence of any damage done to Iran. There is no satellite footage, no videos of the explosions. There is nothing. When Iran attacked Israeli base we had actual hard evidence of what the results were. One has to be an incredibly credulous rube to believe that Israel and Yankeestan were able to attack Iran when they’re unable to provide any evidence of that. You’re such a great illustration how effective propaganda can be on people who are incapable of critical thinking.

                • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  https://www.iranintl.com/en/202412054965

                  You think Iran would release videos of that?

                  I have a UK generals quotes. Not as good as video, but better than nothing. I think you have just Irans public stance? With that I’d say mine has more evidence.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    No, I think Yankeestan would release footage of that if they actually hit something. Just like Iran released footage of the base in Israel when they hit it. If you’re dumb enough to just read unsourced statement with zero supporting evidence and believe it uncritically, then what else is there to say about you. I’m guessing D stands for dufus.

Technology@lemmy.ml

technology@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.ml

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 190 users / day
  • 1.25K users / week
  • 2.39K users / month
  • 7.78K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 37.8K subscribers
  • 4.81K Posts
  • 53.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org