My situation is I have an ability to recall a lot of really old information and some of it seemingly mundane. I can also synthesize all this together to make a good decision quickly.

This is basically what learning is, but it’s a broader base I can pull from and the process is just faster.

I don’t do well with forcing specific information to be cataloged. This means I wasn’t a great student in classes where you needed to just remember things (eg history).

The other thing I’ve got going for me is being able to visually see things in my head. It might be memories, but it’s also things for solving problems like this https://www.intelligencetest.com/questions/visualization/medium/3/8.html

I’m gonna fuck a waffle, marry pancakes, and kill french toast.

Like who even invited french toast to breakfast.

Yeah it’s really there to guide how fucked up it can be and not really be mega prescriptive. It’s not like quantities are on there, either.

Ideally a fire department shows up, sees the signs and then gets in contact with the building owner to start being more specific about what’s ahead of them before they just start dumping a ton of water on the building.

Section 4.2.3.3 of NFPA 704 guides how to handle multiple chemicals.

You can combine the worst of each category into a composite, list each individually, or do a hybrid option.

The posts saying there are two chemicals are true but likely incomplete… There are probably several different chemicals and they decided to go with the hybrid method.

My guess is that they combined the worst rating of everything that doesn’t need special handling, and have a stand alone for the chemical that is incompatible with water (or even combined for several chemicals that are incompatible with water).

To also explain a part of the American tax system… people who are super excited to get a ton of money back on their taxes via refunds are complete idiots.

That’s a direct function of paying too much withholding and not calibrating against their relevant deductions. Some of these people also feel that their tax burden has gone up if their refund is smaller from one year to the next, which may or may not be accurate.

Easily my favorite show of the last 5 years

This was pretty solid! I started it expecting it to be background noise while I doom scrolled… But I got absolutely hooked

Preposterous!

He was also in the TV show Hoogie Dowser, DDS. That’s where he got his first big break.

Neil Patrick Darris.

So say 100 people work at this company, the other 98 not involved don’t want to listen to you rant and rave either. They might understand, but the more you escalate the less they want to deal with your shit either.

Sure, but that’s only because you can’t drive to Europe. Not because England is an island?

But… You can drive to England, if you are already in europe.

So VPN first then Tor is ill advised for this, or only the reverse? What is the potential attack in running Tor while on VPN?

So really, “no value in mixing,” which is distinct from “don’t mix.”

The latter implies a security risk could be created.

Some beach sandwich shop at the outer banks. Fuck that deli roast beef was incredible. 20+ years ago and I think about it still

So long as voltage and frequency match

Local elections are not low stakes. Most of the services you receive are from the municipality you live in.

Just because they’re less polarizing doesn’t mean the stakes are lower.

I was about to go hold up, but neutrons … And then you covered it.

I don’t agree with the can example. Those are physically smaller and lack meaningful slack fill.

Your points stand for the first purchase. After that people will know the proportion of chip to air, and be annoyed by it. If they could do a bag smaller with minimal chip breakage and less air they would both succeed at getting more bags out per pallet and be lauded for not cheating people by selling air.

The slack fill is functional, and I don’t see much incentive to over do it.