Can you get apocalypse insurance? I think I’m in the market for it.

No, no, no. It’s the end of times. I can hear the trumpets of the apocalypse.

Now Valve needs to release half life 3 and the world as we know it will truly perish.

Jokes aside. I hope this means work on a UI overhaul can seriously begin.

I am using eternity. There, it’s just a link but every word is surrounded by ~.

Unfortunately, I don’t think lemmy.world is authoritative in regards to formatting and Lemmy itself – iirc – does not suggest formatting guidelines.

Spoiler formatting is also a pain because of that :/

Why all the tilde symbols? That’s what makes it quite distracting and hard to read for me tbh.

Numpy can use BLAS packages that are partly written in Fortran

Not to mention there are so many more ways to fuck up security when configuring it all on your own outside a container.

Edit: of course one can also fuck up security with a container

Why do you say it’s obvious that the English wiki “has nothing”?

You realize that many of his novels are about how these laws fail?

Can you prove this? Or link a proof?

Then put 23456789 at the start. Doesn’t contain 22 then but all digits in base 10.

And you can strongman this by first using the string 23456789 at the start. It does contain all base 10 digits but not 22.

That’s mathematics. It do be like that sometimes. Counterexamples can be stupid but still valid.

It’s on you to prove your claims.

See my other comment

Let me give another counterexample. Let x be the binary expansion of pi i.e. the infinite string representing pi in base 2.

Now you will not find 2 in this sequence by definition but it’s still a non-repeating number.

Now one can validly say that we restricted our alphabet and we should look only for finite strings with digits that actually occure in the number. The answer is the string “23456789” concatenated with x.

No this does not work. Counter example can be found in the comments here of a non-repeating number that definitely does not contain all finite strings.

Edit: I think the confusion is about the word non-repeating. Non repeating does not mean a subsequence cannot repeat but that you cannot write the number as a rational or with a finite decimal representation. I.e. it’s not 3.ba repeating. Where a is a finite sequence that repeats infinitely and b is a finite sequence.

Edit edit: another assumption you make is that pi does not go into a loop of some kind. You would need to prove that.

Can you prove this? Or link a proof?

There is a reason for that. PDFs de facto “standard” is complex and documentation is sparse. PDFs were also designed to be static and uneditable which makes a lot of simple edits more complex to implement than people think.

How do you cleanly base your local changes against a new upstream version? Merges?

Which is not really open now is it.

Do you live in a world where storage is expensive or rare? Because I more or less forgot the meaning of deleting files.

Also git does support the git protocol as a server if you really need it.