Ha. Haaaaaaa. Noses of dowels!

No silicon heaven? How preposterous!

This has been tried a few times now. Why will this one succeed?

I looked into this at some point in the past.

From memory, despite 0.3 being unrepresenatable, the routine that formats the output rounds it (stringily) to 0.3.

Someone can correct me, because it’s only a vague memory at this point.

Ah, so you’re a println! kinda guy?

I used to eat baked beans cold from the can when I was a student.

You know that the food is cooked in the sealed can at the factory, right?

I watched a documentary about the heinz factory and that was one of the surprising facts I took away from it.

ActiveX

Where’s the money, lebowski?

It’s down there somewhere. Let me take another look.

Comb the area!

It’s not my volt.

They are not designed for this purpose.

Brits watching this unfold with popcorn…

In the UK we’d call this a “conflict of interest”

I disagree. Swearing a useful expressive tool.

Just don’t overuse it and know situations where it’s best not used.

It was fixed.

The sparse index broke it for a few months.

Let’s see if anyone knows these:

• Up down left right a+start
• up c down c left c right c a+start
• up up down down up up up up up a+start
• covertops
• iddt

I agree. You can’t loose.

The standard pysco editor

How is setting up e2e on matrix these days?