traceur201

The developers’ response to the threads bringing this up with them were absolutely abysmal. They wouldn’t even answer the question “does e send data to third parties when this feature is turned off” directly

With that attitude it is 💅

Yeah, I’m all for anonymity but the quality of the article is so poor it’s like it was published or boosted to undermine the position than actually promote it

The problem is that this rule gives a member’s judges direct power over another member’s courts and there’s no clear recourse against members that use this power to violate human rights in ways the member’s citizens would normally be protected from

coming from a conservative media outlet instantly tanks any claim’s credibility imo