It usually doesn’t matter

Thank you for the information. Guess I can’t joke about being a gringo lol

I’ve heard gringo is about language, primarily English (or another native tongue instead of Spanish). Not about being a whitey

Removed by mod

Actually makes sense, there are some takes skirting on the border here

There seems to have been a modding mistake, based on how your comment is displayed in the modlog

Your name is cleared

Removed by mod

It started with DOS and I don’t even know if there was a possibility to have it localized.

Who mean those on the right? They don’t even self identify as leftists, why should some of their followers say that?

I have nothing to argue about. I’ll earnestly fix any mistakes. Honesty can go both ways if you’re willing.

I am outside and there’s no hate. I support the people everywhere.

What is the purpose of attacking with fabrications which don’t match the modlog (context for the people’s court) or the screenshot?

Show it and I’m happy to correct any harmful behavior! :)

Show me as well

Shared to an IM group from somewhere and reshared here. What I understood is it seems to be pretty open when asked how it comes to its answers

Sure, we can allow more trust to I dunno, Nauru, to a certain degree and many not

No safe harbors for socialists anywhere

It would probably only verify that there aren’t really trustworthy governments in the world

State capitalism, as Lenin explained, can be a transitional phase under a proletarian state. However, AES states developed bureaucratic classes managing production, diverging from Marx’s idea of collective control by the working class (Critique of the Gotha Programme).

I do not reject evidence but consider contradictions. AES planning excluded workers from real decision-making, violating Marx’s principle of collective worker control (The Civil War in France).

I never claimed socialism must be flawless. Marx recognized contradictions exist in all stages.

Revolutions prove nothing without examining their results. AES states stabilized under bureaucratic control, sidelining the working class, which Marx and Engels warned against (The Communist Manifesto).

Marx and Engels envisioned workers directly controlling production. The USSR’s soviets were subordinated to a centralized bureaucracy, diverging from this vision (The State and Revolution).

These comments are rooted in Marxism’s principle: the working class must emancipate itself.

It might be valuable to try to be mindful of the displayed habit of repeatedly misrepresenting what is written, either purposefully or out of misunderstanding. This distorts and distracts from the actual topic and makes for a standoffish look.

Sometimes, considering a broader perspective rather than adhering to a rigid viewpoint, even when it feels like it has all the answers you’re looking for, can help break free from those cognitive dissonance patterns.

Good night.

My comments consistently reject perfectionism and dogmatism, focusing instead on grounding socialism in Marxist principles. Claiming that recognizing AES’s contradictions means believing socialism can’t exist is simply false. Whether someone agrees or not is irrelevant. This is commentary, not an effort to convert anyone.

There is no flip-flopping. AES does not align with the Marxist principles.