Losing Naomi Wu to the CCP was a catastrophic loss to the FOSS community, I remember that she once went directly to confront a company (I think located in China) to demand for the release of their modified version of a copyleft software

I hope she’s still alive and doing well

haven’t watched the video yet

I’m curious if they’ve pulled off their magic again

Edit:
Intel what the hell

If Intel gets sued to extinction, anyone who’s purchased an Intel 13/14th gen might become screwed without recourse when it comes to CPU support/remediation, as such:

• whether you’re a company, retailer, manufacturer, and/or end user;
  • (if you’re in the US) you might want to consider contacting the FTC to investigate Pat Gelsinger and Intel’s board of directors for violation of consumer rights, warranty violations, manipulative communication/gaslighting, and a lack of disclosure of known (since 2022) defects for their 13 and 14th gen CPUs (intentionally selling a defective product).

Intel’s egregious predatory manipulative actions has harmed everyone as the hardware ecosystem is such a vital and integrated part of modern society.

Intel, instead of “chopping wood”, perhaps you might want to focus on getting a haircut, your old bangs clearly show split hairs.

If anyone has any recourse/accountability suggestions for Intel owners in other regions/countries please comment below

I’m going to try and figure out if there’s anything similar to the FTC for Canadians

• For Canadians you’ll have the option to contact Competition Bureau Canada

por qué no los dos?

that is 100% true👍

I just saw a good opportunity to use the meme here so I took it😆

depends on your return window,

if you have a chance to refund both your CPU and mobo I’d personally recommend taking it and waiting to see what Intel does if you want to buy Intel’s future processors, you’d also get the option to take a look at AMD’s lineup as well

if you’re outside the return window for both it might still be worth refunding the CPU and seeing if you’d be able to swap the mobo with an AMD equivalent by contacting your board maker [Asus, MSI, Asrock, Gigabyte, NZXT, etc), if they say no then you still have the option to sell as a new board as it sounds like you were on the cusp of the build phase

Always has been

Thinking about this situation again and I’m only just realizing the ripple effects this might have on the company’s future and the future CPU ecosystem

I have to wonder if Intel realizes that they swam out to the ocean with no plan in mind

Please spoiler warning/gate your comment as it’s quite gory and can be triggering for some if not most users

Here’s a template:

thank you!
I’ve added hyfetch to the post🤗

sorry I didn’t do it earlier, had to deal with family stuff!

it’s why I made the TLDW summary as I wanted to save everyone’s time🤗

tbh it’s the same here although I’m starting to see an upwards trend in positive and wholesome activity🌻

“No great thing is created suddenly, any more than a bunch of grapes or a fig. If you tell me that you desire a fig, I answer that there must be time. Let it first blossom, then bear fruit, then ripen.”

• Epictetus

lmao 18 blindfolds?!

that’s pretty impressive dedication :)

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html

the page details what one can do if they find license violations

although based on other comments in this thread it seems that the source code is available in a somewhat odd manner

Network Time Protocol

would you like to try some fish?

ayyyyy nice!👌

also a heads up you might want to install Ublock Origin by Raymond Hill

• free open source(GPL-3.0) ad blocker

judging by the clickbait thumbails alone this guy screams of cringe

That’s pretty neat! I didn’t know about Waydroid till now

however you need to mess with ARM emulation.

not sure about Arch as I’m on NixOS now and the implementation seems to be straightforward but I’ll keep an eye on your note if I do encounter issues

thanks!🤗

From the BTRFS manual:

“Nodatacow implies nodatasum, and disables compression.”

“Datasum implies datacow”

Based on these notes I’d assume that since swapfile disables COW that it also disables checksumming which is where the risk of fragmentation occurs

I could be wrong tho

Make a subvolume only for the swapfile.

doesn’t this kinda defeat the purpose/benefits of using a swapfile?

This is true for all files. Is it a bigger problem for swap?

specificly swapfiles yes, for swap partitions nope

How long ago did you have these issues?

Dec 2022, was still using and testing with swapfiles then and said fuck it as it caused too much problems.

I can’t rule out user error till I retest and strictly “follow the guide to the T” as I made modifications while following the same Arch guide for swapfile with BTRFS

edit:
also for clarification, I’m still not sure which one is optimal/best as I initially thought that using swapfile was forward thinking for the future, I’m using and recommending swap partitions as it seems to be the easiest to implement once and use continuously without any problems atm.