The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass, such a solid title. That and I’ve come back to Battlefield 2042 after only playing the beta, actually not too terrible!
- 0 Posts
- 35 Comments
ladies please, you’re all beautiful
emacs is solely for watching the text version of Star Wars and you know it
I have zero patience when trying to make small adjustments to files, which is what my command line text editor should be for. Nano just has everything at the bottom in case you forget (I do, frequently) so the workflow is ridiculously streamlined for me
I’ll level with you: I’m kind of a moron.
If my command line text editor has its own bespoke integrated command line, then science has gone too far and we need to stop lmao
nano crew where you at
honestly my dumb ass will choose
for i in list:
overfor i := range slice {
every single time. I’m ugly and I’m proud!
didn’t know the go compiler’s name was steeve
mfw my face when the go compiler fucking screams at me because I dared to declare a variable and not use it
Nice, made it extremely clear this time that you have no interest in actually discussing anything. Really appreciate your honesty, have a good one
Damn, still couldn’t make it past the first sentence huh? Really hard question too, I’m not surprised you conveniently ignored it given the aptitude you’ve shown so far. Ain’t my fault that you can’t possibly comprehend two things being somewhat similar yet remaining distinct.
God, I love sealioning.
Yes.
If you had made it past the first sentence you’d see how legit it is.
nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comto World News@beehaw.org•Civilian deaths are indefensible, whether done by Hamas or Israel | Rajan Menon22·2 years agouhhhHHHH nuh-uh dude, you have to pick ONE OR THE OTHER
nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comto World News@beehaw.org•Civilian deaths are indefensible, whether done by Hamas or Israel | Rajan Menon69·2 years agoThe fact that this is only an “opinion” is a fucking travesty
You’re oversimplifying in order to compare the two. Wildly different historical contexts with entirely unrelated events. Distilling both down to “area conquered” just so you can make a point is reductive.
Beyond that though, why does it matter honestly? Does the fact that a city was conquered in the 1400s invalidate anything mentioned so far?
False equivalence, that’s an entirely different historical context. Things can apply to one situation and not another
Oh well of course, at this point in time it’s been made extremely clear that natives will be getting absolutely no land back, even unoccupied land in the plains for example. There’s no major figures in government even remotely speaking on this stuff in a substantial way, so it may as well never happen. Fucked up stuff on top of all the other fucked up stuff.
And also to be fair, implying that most anyone here believes that all land should be returned is pretty naive in and of itself - there are absolutely more options than ALL OF THE LAND and NONE OF THE LAND
Entirely valid, all great points - and to clarify, specifically colonialism from the colonists that colonized the land, no pejorative usage against anyone here
Could have stopped the meme at the top text to be honest