The default street dog which I happened to just learn last week is called a Pariah dog.

“Have you tried shooting back? Usually game characters want you to shoot at them so you can earn points.”

Same.

))))))))))))))

Most lemmies are even more left-leaning than that.

You’re in the wrong sublemmy.
This is where you ask questions.

Why would you ask th…?
Ohhhhh… I get it. It’s a rhetorical question.
Okay, so where’s the button to turn this thing off?
You’re not fooling me AI agent KI4JGT!

• Capitalism
  • lack of policy to treat mental illnesses, like universal healthcare
  • easy access to guns

Like someone already said in here,
I would say that the type of people that are “terrified” are the type that are “hyper-competitive”.
They’re extremely status minded and constantly want to tear people down to pull themselves up.
It’s also why they’re disgusted with non-manliness, which is not the same as gay in my opinion.
You can have a manly man who is gay and a girly man who is heterosexual.
Even making fun of acting tough behavior gets them into disgust.
You can’t have fun with these people.

I do have to say, before I was in a relationship,
I would get annoyed if mistaken for gay and thus prefer to avoid any confusion.
I consider the dating market to be skewed in favor of women simply by the numbers
and anything to further pull down those chances was the last thing I needed.

Not sure what everyone’s opinion here is,
but I find it actually difficult to say that banning smart glasses is a good thing.

The plus side keeping smart glasses legalized to buy or sell,
is that if you’re the victim and it’s recorded, everyone’s going to believe you.

Should we stop criminals from making a mistake?

Kaizo Mario world, level 1, I couldn’t even avoid not jumping on the spinies.
And whatever that japanese cat game was, first boss fight.

Well maybe not crazier than their wildest imaginations since there’s Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.
but certainly matching it.

This however, I think anyone from the 1970s would fail to describe what they’re looking at first try…

endorse the extrajudicial mass killing of protesters and then somehow present that as a sane viewpoint.

Imagine the Jan 6 protesters staying during the insurrection when the US military comes in and then a subgroup of the 3%ers setting the military on fire because the US decided to send in the military unarmed and then the rest of the world calling the killings of these type of insurrectionists, extrajudicial mass killing of innocent protesters instead of rightful action against terrorists.

There is legitimate criticism to what happened during the ‘Chang’an Avenue attacks’, just like there is to the US Democratic party handling of the insurrection.

But saying the equivalent of “The Freedom Plaza crackdown was a mass arrest of innocent US civilians” is so far off what happened during Jan 6 2021, that even the title is wrong.

NixOS user?

Get to the choppa!..
No, not that one.

Having your brick and throwing it too.

But people are immigrating over there.
But due to the Soviet Union collapse event, there’s still huge skepticism on how well China is performing and how badly the US is performing right now, despite the fact that China is already ahead, widening the gap at an accelerating pace and with no end in sight.
We’re going to see a turnaround of events in speed, size and scale like we’ve never seen before.

Socialism is a system that via a people’s democracy mostly puts academics and engineers into power.
What you call “democracy” is liberal democracy that mostly puts merchants/marketers and lawyers into power.

A system that puts marketers in power and a system that rewards people for the fruits of their labor according to their ability, are incompatible because the whole job of a marketer/merchants is to profit as much as possible. And the ‘Trias Politica judiciary & law-graduated politicians’ live off of the marketer’s money so they won’t be able to stop their influence on them, unless they can scare them into submission through the fear of socialist revolutions, which they did when the Gilded Age was ending.
That’s not possible anymore. The Soviet Union has fallen, oligarchic marketers of today are born in wealth and went through a process of ‘retire rich early or live your life chasing profit’ elimination round, unlike those in the 1930s and further automation has caused the marketers to have even more monetary power than those during the Gilded Age.

Second wave socialist revolutions overthrowing the judiciary and merchantry, not second wave capitalist revolutions overthrowing the clergy and aristocracy/nobility.