started using it today, it still is in early stages of development and it’s pretty bugged, but it’s very cool.

the main doubt I have now is if it would be more useful of you could fake activity coherent with your location, for example, because being in EU and faking visits to US gov sites doesn’t exactly sound as stealth.

I could be wrong though.

AdNauseam works on pages you are visiting, as far as I understood.

Fauxx instead does its thing independently in the background.

just as an FYI, having JavaScript off potentially adds to your fingerprint.

yep, same here.

you can also use the status page for verification: https://status.archlinux.org/

what could possibly go wrong?

I see.

the tech giant you mean is IBM I imagine?

what is the difference between the adoption of systemd and that of X or Wayland?

aren’t those equally “mainstream” and don’t they also leave almost no chance to have an alternative (especially for the average user)?

this is a genuine question because, while I know and understand the sentiment against systemd, I realized just now that in the 20 years I’ve been on Linux many things I’ve used were kinda against “freedom”.

more private than what? which features are you looking for?

there are potentially many apps for it, but the question needs to be more specific.

i don’t assume they are lying, I simply don’t blindly believe their advertising claims without tangible evidence.

for example your claim of “no logging” is at best partially false, since their own privacy policy clearly states that IP addresses are at least temporarily collected, always and without exceptions.

who is the owner and how the company is funded is not important here, they are selling products and advertising them through claims that need verification.

then why did you link them?

anyway, the point here is that they are the ones making claims, so they have the burden of proof.

as I told you already, corporations lie to their customers all the time, so it is always better to be safe and wait for the actual proof before trusting any of them.

have you ever checked them?

could you point me to where any of them proves that Proton isn’t actually collecting any data?

because I am only reading about penetration tests and such, which only tell me that their software is reliable against attackers, but that is not the point of the discussion.

also it seems there is no audit for their AI assistant at the link you provided.

can you link me your source about Proton being “proven to not keep any other data”?

welcome to the real world, where corporations lie.

Proton allegedly does it.

It’s all just advertising, until you get the hard evidence.