That’s the point of religion. Trick the brain into thinking everything is going according to plan so that it gives out the happy time drugs instead of the “you need to wake the fuck up and do something about this” drugs. The religion pushers get their cut, and everyone thinks their happy.

praying fascism loses again in the end

Well, that’s what pretty much everyone on the far left is doing, which is going to do absolutely nothing to change anything, and that’s my point. Tear down the Dems and the not-progressive-enoughs all you want, at least they have their asses out there trying to do something instead of literally waiting to die.

This is a lot of words for “Nothing can be done”. You balk at getting a ton of progressives elected, but you advocate getting a bunch of progressives to lead a revolution? You’re kind of hand waving over some huge details there.

It would be easier to get a shitload of progressives elected into positions of power in the US via the democratic party than it would be to lead a successful revolution to overthrow the US government, and I agree with your take on how difficult that would be.

It would be more difficult to build a third party that’s larger than the democratic party than it would be to infiltrate the party with progressives. You said it yourself, the money is center-right. The hard left parties need money, and small doner donations only work if your base is huge, which it isn’t for the hard left.

Historically, running as an independent or unaffiliated has a higher success rate than any other third party, especially at the local level where it matters the most, because those local politicians go on to run for state and federal positions once they build up enough clout.

The real issue is that very few hard-left people have gained the trust and support of the general population. Bernie, AOC and a handful of other progressives have managed to carve out a foothold in the Democratic party, but they’re a handful of people out of hundreds of millions. Where are all the good non-democratic-party leftist leaders? What is the PSL or anyone else doing to build their mind share with the voting public? This kind of “middle mile” groundwork is super important for parties. Having a pipeline of party-affiliated people to run as candidates nationwide is a huge job, and it’s something the Dems and the Republicans have locked down.

A leftist party in the US doesn’t have a base exact because the traditional laborer blocks are uneducated and kept ignorant by the ruling class. They also have very little money. That’s why the Dems go center right for votes. If the left wants to be taken seriously, it MUST participate, at ALL levels. AOC was a joke to the right when she was elected. This past election right-aligned PAC’s spent millions to kick the squad out of government and only succeeded in ousting two of them. IMHO, that’s indicative of a huge shift. Working to change the system works. It’s hard, takes a ton of energy, and a handful of people can’t do it alone.

This kind of opportunistic small-shifts is exactly how the GOP gained all of its power. Every step mattered, from the Karen advocating for banning books in her local elementary school all the way up to state governors passing abortion laws until one of them stuck. The far right has a pathological persistence that no organization on the left has come close to matching, and thats why the fascists are winning. They don’t stop.

It isn’t, but I suppose if you hang out in an echo chamber long enough you’ll believe anything.

You have a few options for enacting ranked choice voting at the national level:

1. Win hundreds, possibly thousands, of state-level House and Senate seats with the largest grass roots voter mobilization ever seen in the US to, a) enact legislation in all 50 states or b) ratify an amendment to the constitution, that mandates it.

2. Kill enough republicans in a national civil war to make sure that when elections happen, there aren’t enough republicans left to win an election, then enact the above.

3. Overthrow the entire US government in a much bloodier national coup and set up whatever government you want.

I’m not the person who asked the first time but I am curious, I’m literally asking you what you’re doing other than yelling at the Internet.

Do you usually react like this when someone asks a simple question?

What are you doing?

I have a very old 4K Toshiba TV with a built in “smart browser” that, due to me never plugging into the Internet, has a home page with news about how well Obama’s doing in the polls for being a relatively unknown junior senator.

Settings -> Homepage:

Uncheck everything “sponsored”.

Done.

A coworker once got an HR talking-to for printing this meme out and leaving it on all the dev’s desks.

I once tanked a production service by assuming it could handle at least as much load as my laptop on residential sub-gigabit Internet could produce.

I was wrong by at least an order of magnitude.

A decent compromise might be to pick a short phrase she can remember, and make all her passwords that phrase+the name of the service.

Like her bank password would be “iloveop+bank”, her Netflix would be iloveop+netflix", etc.

My mom’s password manager is a pen and paper notebook. It’s not ideal, but it keeps me from having to reset everything every month, and she chooses slightly more complex passwords since she doesn’t have to remember them (even though she is slowly memorizing them)

The book was so on point people still argue if it was pro or anti fascism.

Shoot for the FALGSC, fall amongst the CyberpunkDystopia.

War will be automated too. That’s going to be “fun” too. Not even Star Trek skipped that part.

Believe it or not, things can exist independently of Marx having described them.