Putting aside the question, the answer is that they should use upstream or Mint. There are basically no exceptions.

Second phone, second email.

Forgiveness and trust are two different things.

Nothing is ever completely unforgivable (emphasis on the “completely”), literal Hitler aside.

If someone murders their spouse in a fit of rage and not only shows intense remorse for their crimes but also dedicates their life to helping others at tremendous cost to themselves, I’d be able to forgive them.

I can’t even make time for all the PC games I want to play. Just recently I had to remove Deltarune, Void Stranger, Ghostland Yard, and Blacksmith Song of Two Kings from my wishlist and boy has that been giving me an existential crisis.

It would be an absolute nightmare if I added console exclusives to the mix.

I should’ve put more emphasis on the word “unforgivable”. I assumed people would read my random Lemmy post more closely.

There are a variety of reasons people commit murder, but there’s only one reason they rape someone and that is for their own pleasure at the expense of others. For that reason, the crime of rape is far harder to forgive.

Wait you’re saying that Platner drunkenly raping his GF is worse than murdering her?

Putting aside which is worse … the crime of rape is far more unforgivable than the crime of murder.

As did OP.

No you didn’t.

Putting aside which is worse, and putting aside the race element, the crime of rape is far more unforgivable than the crime of murder. Although the far-right, not just in America, seems very quick to forgive rapists.

Don’t know about using a Debian Testing base, just because the word “testing” does not inspire confidence.

Didn’t the math not check out on this particular technology when it was proposed by western venture capitalists years ago?

First thing I do when installing an OS is disable animations. It’s the quickest way to make a desktop feel snappier.

Require age verification only if you want to get algorithmic recommendations. That way you can still engage in the social internet anonymously as an adult.

The recommendation algorithms give American big tech way too much political sway in Europe and ideally they should be banned entirely, but age verification at least gives the appearance that this is “for the children” and not something with (justifiable) political motivations.

Privacy is not something that neatly aligns with the left-right spectrum.

Well at least they’re not merging NSFW filters with a broader ban on social media. For those that do so, it is a terrible implementation because if kids only want one or the other, then falsifying their age gets them both.

Owned by a company with dubious motivations, who owns multiple VPN’s under different branding as what is undeniably an effort to deceive people, and based out of a country famous for selling spyware.

*turntables

Kape Technologies.

The thing about this data is that it isn’t controlled for quality (probably, I only skimmed the article). I don’t support AI “art” myself but I don’t bother checking the AI disclosure normally unless it looks clearly AI generated.

EDIT: I got around to reading the original PC Gamer article it’s implied that various factors are controlled for. But realistically there’s no way to actually control for the quality. They apparently filtered out obvious slop though. We can conclude from the data that AI disclosure reduces sales, or that AI use reduces game quality, or both.