Arch is for control freaks, which means it takes a lot of work and patient to get it to work for your specific needs. If you don’t have the time and patient for that (which is more then understandable) then you shouldn’t use it.

You have to remember that most people aren’t power users. A lot of people find if difficult to even install Windows. Vanilla Arch isn’t for everybody.

Flatpak is the best one imo. Never used appimages, and snap is pure trash (close source, slow, made by canonical). Overall, native packages are imo the way to go, but flatpak is also fairly good.

As someone who tried both, I think Endevour is better. 1.It’s more bleeding edge. 2. It’s as close to vanilla Arch as you can get with a gui installer. 3. The dev team seems to be more compitent then the Manjaro team (i.e: shit doesn’t break because someone pushed a WIP package). 4. Better community support (I mean, it’s literally just Arch with a fancy installer).

They’re both fairly easy to install. And it’s fairly easy to switch between the two.

I had to check if that’s actually true. And yep, this is real.

Sub looks like a satire. I refuse to believe this people are legit

More like No Man’s Crash

Earthbound would keep you busy for quite a while

May I ask, why did you go with Retrodeck instead of emudeck. Not judging or anything, just curious about the advantages.

Mostly playing Fallout 3 atm. Planning on finally finishing Skyrim on the deck as well. I’ve also played quite a bit of itch.io games on there lately.

I always wanted to migrate to Endevour. But for some reason, I can’t install it on my duel boot machine. Keeps giving me the same error. I’ve switched to Manjaro instead and it works just fine.

Manjaro is great. Gives you all of the needed features of Arch, without the need to go through a clean install.