

Mostly that problems affecting men are far more likely to get sympathy, attention, and funding.
What gave you this impression?


Mostly that problems affecting men are far more likely to get sympathy, attention, and funding.
What gave you this impression?


I’m a recent MBA grad and I can attest that stuff like this was an important part of the curriculum re: sustainable growth. Cutting corners, focusing on short term profits is always a dead end. When leaders get lazy and don’t drive a culture that is aligned with the company’s mission, values, and obligations, decay is inevitable. The Boeing board of directors is as complicit in all of this as their executives are.
I don’t necessarily believe you have to have deep expertise in a given field to govern a business in said field. Often it’s even an advantage to come in with a fresh set of eyes. But you need to at least RESPECT that field and its experts and be forthright about taking responsibility when you take action intended to eliminate waste. If the only metric you are using is revenue, or operating profit, or whatever, you are creating an organization that is incentivized to maximize those at the expense of other, core-business-critical factors. If you’re making something inconsequential, by all means take those risks and race to the bottom. But when people’s lives are at stake, you need to have reverence for what your business actually does.


I feel like this suit should be DOA. The only leg they appear to be able to stand on is DLC requiring to be purchased through Steam but - how on earth would that work otherwise?
Feels like they’re fishing for a settlement.
Why would anyone want to use a public steam group anyway. Not defending this turd but if you can’t self-filter unmoderated spaces it’s best to just stay out of them, it’s not sustainable for every last corner of the internet to be actively and aggressively moderated in real time.
I’m not sure what you were expecting either way