anakronos@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agothis is not coolsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1122arrow-down11
arrow-up1121arrow-down1imagethis is not coolsh.itjust.worksanakronos@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareonlooker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoAgreed. It should say “costs”. I’ll show myself out now.
minus-squareWingedSeven@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoit seems like it happens enough to be an acceptable alternate way of saying the cost of something; I see it a lot, including (in fact mostly) by native speakers
minus-squareBrewJajaja@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoIn my experience/opinion, native English speakers have a different set of grammatical errors compared to non-natives. Obviously there is an overlap.
minus-squareDemonen@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoLanguages evolve, or we’d all still be grunting the first sounds. “No, the other other rock. Damn, we should come up with more names for things!”
Agreed. It should say “costs”.
I’ll show myself out now.
it seems like it happens enough to be an acceptable alternate way of saying the cost of something; I see it a lot, including (in fact mostly) by native speakers
In my experience/opinion, native English speakers have a different set of grammatical errors compared to non-natives. Obviously there is an overlap.
Languages evolve, or we’d all still be grunting the first sounds. “No, the other other rock. Damn, we should come up with more names for things!”