davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml to Videos@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agoThe China They Don't Want You to See: Xinjiangwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square349linkfedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down18
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkThe China They Don't Want You to See: Xinjiangwww.youtube.comdavel [he/him]@lemmy.ml to Videos@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square349linkfedilink
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·3 months agofair trials are not simply about the conviction rate, they are about the rights of the citizens holding up under the oppression of the court.
minus-squareMarxMadness@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 months agoThen why are you citing (alleging, really, without a citation) conviction rates in China as evidence that their judicial system isn’t fair?
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·3 months agobecause the conviction rate in China is pretty good. evidence that their judicial system isn’t fair.
minus-squareMarxMadness@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 months agoWhy do you keep making comments when you know almost nothing about the topic and clearly haven’t thought any of this through?
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·3 months agopeople keep asking me questions about a topic I’m familiar with, so I keep answering them.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 months agoYou mean you keep evading them, sometimes by pretending to lack objective permanence.
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·3 months agoThe classic tactic of evasion through clear answers, a public record, facts and sources.
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·3 months agono, that’s not what I mean.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 months agoYes it is. as has been demonstrated though clear facts and sources.
fair trials are not simply about the conviction rate, they are about the rights of the citizens holding up under the oppression of the court.
Then why are you citing (alleging, really, without a citation) conviction rates in China as evidence that their judicial system isn’t fair?
because the conviction rate in China is pretty good. evidence that their judicial system isn’t fair.
Why do you keep making comments when you know almost nothing about the topic and clearly haven’t thought any of this through?
people keep asking me questions about a topic I’m familiar with, so I keep answering them.
You mean you keep evading them, sometimes by pretending to lack objective permanence.
The classic tactic of evasion through clear answers, a public record, facts and sources.
Which you have not done.
no, that’s not what I mean.
Yes it is. as has been demonstrated though clear facts and sources.