• fum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s no longer open source if you restrict commercial usage. Sure, licence your software that way if you want to, but don’t call it open source.

        • fum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ubuntu and LibreOffice are both free for commercial use. Or am I misunderstanding what you mean?

            • fum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I see what you mean. Yes there are great examples like those that offer support contracts for the open source software projects.

              I think one point of confusion here is that as open source licenced projects, they do not restrict commercial use. The companies that lead the development just happen to also offer the best paid support.

              Minor correction: proxmox is AGPL so free to use commercially without their support contract.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Okay, I would love that but let me see if I can play devils advocate and get productive responses that work in the capitalistic world we are stuck in.

      Why would a company pay a team millions of dollars annually to give it away for free. That destines their entire company for failure in their mind. They get no kick backs other than a thank you note for doing so… Which means nothing to their bottom line but down.