• 1 Post
  • 155 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 27th, 2024

help-circle

  • ubergeek@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlSo anyway
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Yes, sorry… the militia clause, as its known

    The purpose of the militia is to put down insurrection, not to engage in it.

    The word “regulated” has had only one actual meaning… the same as it means to regulate interstate commerce.

    And only a couple of years later, the militia acts passed.


  • ubergeek@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlSo anyway
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I pray you actually read what people point you too:

    No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law






  • ubergeek@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlSo anyway
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    In your case, I’d suggest considering the fact that gun laws usually have grandfather clauses, in order to pass constitutional muster (Depriving people of property, without recompense).

    So, the fash will be heavily armed, and any resistance to that cannot arm themselves.



  • ubergeek@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlSo anyway
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    In this context when they write about a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a “free State,” they actually imply that the security guarantee is against a tyrannical state of which they had recently been at war with.

    No, it doesn’t. Read Article 8, as it describes what the militia’s purpose is. At the time “the people” meant “the states”, as each state was to be secure in it’s own abilities and authorities to manage it’s militias. The purpose was to put down insurrections and slave revolts.

    Remember, also, that to be “in the militia”, you were also reporting for regular muster and inspections. By the government.





  • Fixed that for you.

    Did you, though, or just try to lie?

    I mean, were Palestinians being genocided in Israel for… most of Biden’s presidency? And didn’t Harris say she fully supported Biden’s policies?

    Indigenous people? They are laughing at us right now, because us white people are freaking out about stuff that’s been happening to them since white people showed up here.

    Union workers? Come on, it’s not illegal for rail workers to strike in the US, thanks to Biden, who Harris, once again, said, she fully supported his policies.

    Good for homeless people, as in creating more homeless people every year? Houselessness was spiking under Biden, and still is…

    If Kamala Harris had won, literally all the groups you just mentioned would be far better off than under a literal fascist dictatorship which Trump’s lackeys want to establish.

    How so, specifically?

    Honestly? I’m starting to believe lemmy is, like reddit, filled with a bunch of clueless college kids who haven’t set foot in other parts of the world and have no idea what it’s like to live under a dictatorship, and thus take the rights and freedoms they have completely for granted.

    I’m starting to think you believe the rest of the world is ok with how we treat our citizens, and do the same…


  • Worse for non cis people

    How so, specifically, that wasn’t happening prior?

    worse for women

    Same. How so, specifically?

    worse for education

    Public education, to put in the words of Lupe Fiasco:

    “Your child’s future was the first to go with budget cuts If you think that hurts, then wait, here comes the uppercut The school was garbage in the first place, that’s on the up and up”

    Brown people in the US have always gotten the shit end of the stick, with public education.

    worse for immigrants

    What if I told you that Biden was deporting people at a faster rate than Trump is?

    worse for people in countries being directly and indirectly threatened by your fascist president

    Like, which countries? Palestine was being genocided before Trump was elected. And we’ve been raping under developed nations for a long time. Frankly, a lot of those nations are getting a break now, with Trump’s focus on turning the imperialism inwards.


  • It seems like it’s mostly getting worse for white, cishet people. Queer people were already under attack, and being lynched. We’ve been hammering on immigrants for like… 30 or so years now. etc etc.

    My what? Are you a child?

    Your beloved liberal republic here, the one that loves to genocide people, loves to be racist, loves to put dollars over humans, and loves to start wars to topple democratic societies abroad.




  • Every single one of those elections, the Dems chanting “us or fascism!!”

    It’s kinda like the gun safety debate: we can not discuss it within 72 hrs of a mass shooting.

    After 72 hrs, nobody wants to talk about it, or we have another one.

    When will the Dems actually oppose fascism, instead of saying they want to?

    Additionally, who is that “boring liberal republic” better for? Certainly not Palestinians. Certainly not for union workers on our rail lines. Not for people becoming houseless. Not for queer people. Not for indigenous peeps, either…

    So, just for white, straight people, so we need to keep supporting it?