It may seem like a lot, but if you take the time to read through it; it will likely lead to a solution. Although it’s the arch wiki most of the content will be applicable.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dual_boot_with_Windows

nasm is an assembler though, not a ‘languages’, that only supports x86/x64. gas for example supports a wide range of architectures so you can write risc-v, arm, x64, etc.

1. emacs

2. emacs

3. emacs

4. emacs

5. emacs

6. emacs

7. emacs

8. emacs

9. vim

10. emacs

11. emacs

12. emacs

13. emacs

14. emacs

15. emacs

Dave Mustaine is a massive piece of shit.

Most likely no one is bothered at all because input is already validated and OP is just a moron.

No offense, but reading through the comments it’s apparent you’re not very familiar with systems programming nor linux development. This is a common problem with vocal ‘rustaceans’, rust is their hammer regardless of the domain.

Although considering rust is prudent, there are still a ton of advantages to using C for systems programming. It is not a binary choice, there are pros and cons, and every project should choose what aligns with their priorities.

No one has ever stated that linux will be in the kernel. It was ‘go ahead and give it a shot’, which includes convincing maintainers to accept your patches. Linus has delegated trust to subsystems maintainers and an established process.

Hellwig could have been more tactful, but like it or not, arguments against a cross-language codebase have merit. Framing it as a ‘clear confession of sabotage of the r4l project’, attempting to weaponize the CoC, and trying to drum up an army via social media was all out of line.

Success was never a given, if they want r4l to succeed then they have to get patches approved and crying wolf ain’t gonna cut it.

Emacs client library and interface for Lemmy instances.

https://codeberg.org/martianh/lem.el

If you have the hardware, then yes, you can.

alias upgrayedd='<snapshot cmd> && pacman/paru ...'

OR

upgrayedd() {
    <pre>
    <snapshot cmd>
    pacman/paru "$1"
    <post>
}

focused on stability and is not as up-to-date as other distros

This community really should stop FUD peddling about debian.

stable is not the only debian release, and there are multiple ways to pull newer package versions. For instance, anyone who can read a manual can run a cutting edge rolling release debian box with this simple incantation:

sudo sed -i 's/bookworm/sid/g' /etc/apt/sources.list

stable is their default, but debian can be just as “up-to-date” as you want it to be.

sudo sed -i 's/bookworm/sid/g' /etc/apt/sources.list

sleep 1500 && echo -e '\a' &

https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/dmesg.1.html

https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/journalctl.1.html