Gnome Console since it is consistent with the rest of Gnome and works well enough.
- 1 Post
- 15 Comments
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Anybody have a solution for dotfiles outside /home1·2 years agoThose configuration files are for managing system’s package manager, so I don’t think
$HOME
would be a better place.
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Anybody have a solution for dotfiles outside /home3·2 years agoFrom lack of a better solution, I would symlink the folder or use
stow --target /etc
flag if you use stow for managing dotfiles.
Gentoo and Alpine are both really great distributions.
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Does anyone actually like the default GNOME workflow?21·2 years agoAnd with lots of polish and convenient features.
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Does anyone actually like the default GNOME workflow?321·2 years agoYes, I thrive in it.
Thank you for indulging me! I tried Alpine for a moment with Sway but it was really bare and I had some issues with setting up seatd and/or elogind to ensure some usual niceties like auto-mounting of usb drives etc. I was curious how is daily-driving it experienced by others.
How do you handle lack of systemd? Do you use elogind or seatd? Do you package some things yourself considering Alpine isn’t popular as a desktop distribution?
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Anyone else starting to favor Flatpak over native packages?English2·2 years agoThat doesn’t mean it is the only option.
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Anyone else starting to favor Flatpak over native packages?English2·2 years agoBut there are other options with Silverblue.
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•What do you like about your Linux Distro?English2·2 years agoUbuntu usually provides you with system working out of the box. Same goes for Fedora and its spins. Arch is DIY distribution, which means that the “missing” stuff you have to install/configure yourself.
archinstall
gives you just a basic start.If you don’t know your way around bare window managers, then yeah, it would be a good idea to try with things preconfigured: EndeavourOS should give you that, Fedora Sway spin also.
Or you could bite the bullet and try to provide the missing things yourself and learn in the process. What are you missing?
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Share Your Favorite Linux Distros and Why You Love Them2·2 years agoStable rolling release
alternateved@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•The Linux Experiment - NIX OS: the best package manager on the most solid Linux distributionEnglish1·2 years agoTake this with a grain of salt.
I loved using NixOS with flakes, home-manager and custom minimalistic setup with XMonad or Sway. I was also using Nix with direnv whenever I could for my development projects. At the same time I’ve noticed that a lot of my programming focus (and time) was being used by solving niche issues with Nix, packaging things for Nix, suddenly breaking applications (because of upstream changes within nixpkgs). I’ve also had issues with using other ways of providing development environment (npm, pip stuff etc).
I was using unstable channel so breakages part is most likely on me. But apart from that I’m left with the feeling that NixOS is a huge time sink which isn’t necessarily worth it if you aren’t managing a whole fleet of machines.
Nowadays I am happy not using Nix at all. My development needs are fullfilled by what is available via dnf (Fedora package manager) and npm. I also use podman containers and flatpak a lot more since I’ve switched to Silverblue.
Check ublue approach like for example in this repo: https://github.com/ublue-os/beyond
In other words, leverage native OCI containers.