What else are you looking for?

Sources to back up your claim would be nice.

Honest question, do you do any research on this topic or do you just go on how you feel about nuclear?

“Recent studies show that a global transition to 100% renewable energy across all sectors – power, heat, transport and desalination well before 2050 is feasible. According to a review of the 181 peer-reviewed papers on 100% renewable energy that were published until 2018, “[t]he great majority of all publications highlights the technical feasibility and economic viability of 100% RE systems.” A review of 97 papers published since 2004 and focusing on islands concluded that across the studies 100% renewable energy was found to be “technically feasible and economically viable.” A 2022 review found that the main conclusion of most of the literature in the field is that 100% renewables is feasible worldwide at low cost.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100%25_renewable_energy

You:

We do not live in a world where Solar/Wind can replace fossil fuels, only nuclear can actually do that.

I’m asking you to back this assertion up. If you can’t, just admit that rather than trying to deflect.

I can’t tell if you’re uninformed or a troll.

battery farm

Is there some kind of upper limit on how much wind/solar/storage we can build out that I’m unaware of?

but don’t expect 120V when you plug into the wall socket.

Why is that?

We do not live in a world where Solar/Wind can replace fossil fuels, only nuclear can actually do that.

Care to expand on this?