You think the internet is going to really take off a couple years from now?
- 0 Posts
- 120 Comments
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•You Should Stop Using Meta (Facebook) Products at All Costs
2·19 days agoGenerally couldn’t agree more, but
What the fuck does a piece of software need that exorbitant amount for anyway?
For a widely used chat app with calling and video calling, servers.
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•To British(UK)/US: Sign the petition "Introduce an immediate ban on the sale and promotion of smart glasses"
2·1 month agoWTF are you talking about? I’m not condoning anything, just giving my estimate of the likely factual outcome. And no military man earned my freedom, such as I have any it was won by union organisers and socialist activists.
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•To British(UK)/US: Sign the petition "Introduce an immediate ban on the sale and promotion of smart glasses"
12·1 month agoThe obligatory response to this is “there’s no expectation of privacy in public places”,
That is a USA-specific legal standard which doesn’t apply in much of the world. While it has it’s upsides it also has downsides and it shouldn’t be seen as gospel, or the only way to do things.
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•To British(UK)/US: Sign the petition "Introduce an immediate ban on the sale and promotion of smart glasses"
9·1 month agoNah, you will just individually get sent to jail or shot by the police depending on the country, and that’ll be enough of a warning to everyone else.
If there’s not already enough data for someone to be convinced, more data isn’t going to help. All the information people need is readily out there. What we lack is solidarity, community and movement building, and some slop video isn’t going to help that.
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Every privacy app asks you to trust them. We ask you not to.
13·3 months agoWe already have all this stuff, stop larping as a 1337 h4x0r and go fix some bugs in your preferred xmpp client or one of those Firefox forks
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Intercepted transmission — anonymous.gratis
71·3 months agoIf not larp then why cringe shaped?
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•EX-11: Prepping for Plasma’s Last X11-Supported Release – David Edmundson's Web Log
3·3 months agoso if everyone in the world used kde, “only” the usa would be on x11
you’re right, they shouldn’t support imperial measurements
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•EX-11: Prepping for Plasma’s Last X11-Supported Release – David Edmundson's Web Log
8·3 months agoWell, now you know one who doesn’t and hasn’t for years
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Technology@beehaw.org•SHL0MS(famous prankster on X/Twitter) baited AI haters by posting a real painting by Monet, claiming it was AI generated. The post got viral(>6M views) as art critics started deleting their replies
10·4 months agoI don’t think that’s relevant to their comment, this isn’t branching out of their field when they’re old and senile and success has gone to their heads. This is probably in the top 100 most famous paintings (or at least some from that series are) and extremely recognizable, just the fundamental basics of the field. Even when he started on his crazy vitamin C megadosing bullshit, Pauling almost certainly understood the electronic structure of atoms just fine.
Or for short, The Aristocrats
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Arch Linux@lemmy.ml•Is there a systematic way to find out which fonts I'm missing?
6·4 months agowhat a flex lmao
A single diode a micrometer away from anything else is not suddenly a transformer without which a 400 um2 antenna stops working.
They’re fabricating micrometer components with a 90 nm process. That’s pretty well in the classical regime. If they’re seeing substantial tunneling at that scale it would be rather noteworthy to say the least.
i remember there was a diode and transistor that were literally completely seperated from the traces of the rest of the chip, and yet they were functional pieces and the chip wouldnt work if you removed them.
If that was true they would be getting the Nobel in physics for discovering some incredible new quantum phenomena, it would be front-page news everywhere. I highly doubt it’s true.
Frustratingly, that article you linked doesn’t actually link to the paper. But it is in Nature Communications. That’s a respectable journal but not that prestigious, and it publishes a lot of over hyped stuff. Not that any journal doesn’t. But if they had really found new physics with AI chip design that would go to Science, Nature, or maybe PRL.
Edit: ah, I found it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54178-1
Chip design isn’t at all my specialty so take my opinion about this with a grain of salt. But I think it’s notable that
Prior works in nanophotonics have demonstrated the class of inverse methods for specific dielectric-based passive structures through gradient based optimizations such as adjoint method
So, there are already known algorithmic approaches to solving for these. I think it’s also notable that these are for signal transformation and antennae, relatively simple operations.
This seems like a vaguely useful result but I don’t expect it’ll be breaking any new ground any time soon.
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•After 90 days we *may* not see Session on our app stores again
1·5 months agodeleted by creator
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Privacy-focused tablet: LineageOS or /e/ OS?
81·5 months agoYes, but there is a good reason for that.


If your car is from the 90s then a book on car repair from the 90s will do.