Cool. KFC chicken stuffed crust nacho chalupa with a side of trucker pills, please.
- 2 Posts
- 255 Comments
Somewhere there has to be a store where those 3 are crammed together into one monstrosity.
I now have a purpose in life.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•GNOME Boxes Preparing To Deliver Much Improved Virtualization Experience
1·1 month agoThat makes sense.
That’s too bad. SPICE looked like a promising alternative to VNC and RDP.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•GNOME Boxes Preparing To Deliver Much Improved Virtualization Experience
1·1 month agoWhat was wrong with the old Boxes?
It didn’t support containers or the more advanced features of libvirtd like virt-manager does, but it seemed fine for what it was the couple of times I tried it out.
I was just thinking of the ex-gf who didn’t believe Star Wars was about Vietnam. I should add that to the list of reasons for the break up.
Never date a centrist. If they’re not a militant leftist, don’t bother kids. 😂
Not good thoughts, not good thoughts by the way. Thinking about the writing group I dropped because “that’s always been my thing”.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•FreeBSD 16 Retires The Last Of Its GPL Code From Its Base System
1·2 months agoYep. That is what the ‘D’ stands for, which is largely historical at this point, and originally, all code was shared code.
The shared code pool which spawned the BSD hasn’t existed in decades, and the BSDs have been stand alone operating systems since February 1994 when the USL lawsuit was settled with 4.4BSD-lite.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•FreeBSD 16 Retires The Last Of Its GPL Code From Its Base System
2·2 months agoThey favor permissive licenses ( BSD or MIT ).
Aside from that, they want to work on something different.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•FreeBSD 16 Retires The Last Of Its GPL Code From Its Base System
1·2 months agoFreeBSD is a full OS separate from GNU and Linux. It’s not a distribution.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•We all have a retirement plan, even if we dont know what it is.
2·2 months agoYeah, “In Bruges”.
Yeah, RH Linux was free at one point. I remember getting CDs with a book in the ‘90s and when it was discontinued in favor of RHEL.
Fedora was supposed to be the replacement for RH Linux. It was supposed to be what CentOS is today, a close upstream for RHEL, but the Fedora community had other ideas. 🙂
- non LTS version available (Atomic desktops are easier to manage if keeping un-updated for very long periods)
Fedora is a semi-rolling release distribution, so this isn’t really a problem for a desktop or laptop. It’s really an advantage for desktops and laptops.
- it uses RPM packages which are good, but there might be some software only offering DEBs (containers and extraction tools can help with that)
A lot of software is packaged as a Flatpak image, so less of a problem then it used to be.
Yeah, the Fedora community revolted when RH tried to force Fedora to be what they wanted, and RH left Fedora to the community after that. 😆
Moving CentOS upstream of RHEL? That was a good thing. RHEL didn’t have a true upstream, and now that is CentOS. The RHEL and the clones now have a central place to upstream code, and they now are the EL ecosystem instead of only RHEL. It’s created more diversity and has added more options.
For example, Alma doesn’t have to be bug-for-bug compatible with RHEL. They can carry their own patches and add features which their base wants and only be binary compatible.
Canonical’s engineering is poor. They build weird stuff, and they want to close Linux off through CLA and permissive licenses. They aren’t a trust worthy company.
RH does more. RH is Linux for all intents and purposes.
Fedora is better. At one time, Ubuntu was good, but that was 20 years ago. The Fedora community has done a great job of stepping up to make it a great desktop distribution.
It’s possible to create a custom Linux ISO. That will solve the application installation problem.
Windows was trash, BeOS didn’t take off, and all the good network diagnostic tools were exclusively on *nixes in the early 2000s. Later, the *nixes are better for application development and deployment. They’re just built to serve data.
Windows has kind of caught up in the tooling department largely thanks to a VM, but it’s still trash. LOL
Idealogically, I can own my tools and modify them if needed. I don’t modify them, but hypothetically I could.
The distro doesn’t really matter. Buying more efficient hardware and running efficient software matters.
A 65w proc is going to use less electricity then a 240w proc. Native software is more efficient then running lots of web browsers.
If you really want to know how much power the desktop is using, measure. Measure the power coming out of the wall. Measure how much time the system is active, and feed that into a time series database with a something like Grafana for visualizations.
jollyrogue@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Why are so many Linux projects on Microsoft GitHub? Shouldn't they all move to Codeberg?
271·3 months agoFor some people, they don’t actually care about the politics of FOSS; they want a portfolio for employers.
Affect other distros?
Hopefully, they’ll all get something better then cloud-init.
Canonical pumps out dumb stuff.
Good idea. Test them on some gummy worms.
Also, who has shrooms?