… did you just post “Why are ‘Why is X bad?’ posts bad?”
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The anti-minimalist backlash is the bigger story behind Oxygen’s revival
32·4 days agoUI’s peaked with the CLI. It’s all been downhill from there
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Science@lemmy.ml•Chinese research team makes breakthrough in space-based gravitational wave detection
3·5 days agoBeing a particularly dumb fellow layman but seeing no other comments after 18h…
I’m picturing a ruler thrown into gravity waves and another ruler somehow measuring the parts of the first one where millimeter markers stop being one millimeter apart.
Now for Gemini’s summary:
Space-based gravitational wave detection is the study of ripples in spacetime using observatories positioned in orbit rather than on Earth. While ground-based detectors like LIGO and Virgo have already proven these waves exist, they are limited by their size and Earth’s seismic “noise.”
How It Works
Space-based detection uses laser interferometry across millions of kilometers of vacuum.
• The Formation: LISA will consist of three spacecraft flying in a triangular formation, roughly 2.5 million kilometers apart, orbiting the Sun behind the Earth.
• The “Arms”: Each spacecraft contains “test masses” (gold-platinum cubes) that float freely in a vacuum, shielded from solar wind and radiation.
• The Measurement: Lasers are fired between the spacecraft to monitor the distance between these cubes. When a gravitational wave passes through the formation, it causes the fabric of space to stretch and squeeze, changing the distance between the cubes by a fraction of an atom’s width.
… Honestly I’m feeling reasonably good about my dummy understanding. The “rulers” are lasers being shot between satellites all around the Earth, but I think it sounds roughly right?
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Is everything in your life the way you want it to be & you're comfortable & feel no angst?
2·5 days agoI’m fairly sure this isn’t something human brains can do
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Are you on which team: vim, nano, micro, er ed for you terminal based text editor?
7·14 days agoVim sorely underrated. Great tools/hotkeys. Felt like a master pianist clacking away while the terminal went berserk until suddenly the 2 hour job was done in 20 minutes.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's a scam that's so normalized that we don't even realize it's a scam anymore?
8·18 days agoNo no no. I gave them CULTURE! A wonderful work culture.
And security! Sure, not the security I decided I need for myself, and it’s only really present as long as they’re profitable to me, but security nonetheless.
After all, I had the idea and stuck my neck out to secure the financing, which is far more important than the actual daily labor that keeps things running.
We’re like a family, see.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's a gadget or appliance that you purchased that you would wholeheartedly recommend to others?
1·27 days agoThe vacuum sealer reminds me: a handheld electric pump.
Some are strong enough to blow up car tires. Especially if you have kids, they’re great for inflating water toys and balls and whatnot.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's a gadget or appliance that you purchased that you would wholeheartedly recommend to others?
1·27 days agoSecond the warm white Christmas lights.
They can quickly make a depressing apartment feel like a warm home.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's a gadget or appliance that you purchased that you would wholeheartedly recommend to others?
2·27 days agoLAN tester.
I thought of it as fancy electrician / network equipment. Not anymore. Now it’s basic troubleshooting / procedure.
On a particularly frustrating switch installation, I picked one up for like $20 on Amazon, and it’s made me much less annoyed by network changes.
For context, I’m one of those people who hoards any electronic bits that might prove useful on a hobby project later, so lots of old patch cables and cable reels with unknown breaks, so maybe a LAN tester is really only worth it for others like that, but I’d recommend it to any level of tech enthusiast at least.
1940: “These mechanical monstrosities lack the intuitive check of a human mind. A mathematician can spot a stray digit through reason; a machine will blindly process an error to its conclusion. We are trading the elegance of thought for a noisy, fallible crate of glass and wire.”
1950: “Direct control is the only honest way to command a machine. If you cannot visualize the specific vacuum tube you are firing, you aren’t truly programming. To delegate this to any intermediary is to invite a loss of precision that the hardware simply cannot afford.”
1955: “These ‘mnemonics’ are a crutch for the lazy. By using words instead of addresses, the programmer loses the vital ‘feel’ for memory layout. We are seeing a five-fold decrease in efficiency; no automated assembler can ever match the tight, hand-calculated loops of a master of bits.”
1965: “Compilers are the death of performance. These languages allow ‘programmers’ who don’t even understand the CPU architecture to bloat memory with generic subroutines. Software is becoming a black box—impenetrable, unoptimized, and dangerously detached from the reality of the silicon.”