sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agoDesigning Firefox for the futureblog.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up181arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1external-linkDesigning Firefox for the futureblog.mozilla.orgsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square59linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoIf that were the entire truth, neither brave nor opera would be as popular as they are.
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoIn my assessment, all browsers suck badly at performance and resource usage at the moment. How does a 25mb website content result in 350mb of ram usage for that tab? And why would it not render basically instantly. I am old enough to remember in the early 2000s, when page loads were near instant. Even for large e-commerce and social media websites.
If that were the entire truth, neither brave nor opera would be as popular as they are.
In my assessment, all browsers suck badly at performance and resource usage at the moment.
How does a 25mb website content result in 350mb of ram usage for that tab? And why would it not render basically instantly.
I am old enough to remember in the early 2000s, when page loads were near instant. Even for large e-commerce and social media websites.